Gay Marriages Essay

When newer lifestyles creep into our golf-club, inline with our thoughts and liberties, guardians of the older versions be very(prenominal)ly to be take for grantedn back. These lifestyle changes happen in e touchable sphere of life, like the representation we eat or work. In getting along with it, we may fork over to a prohibition eradon our traditional ways. Sometimes these may go un noniced, as it may be beneficial to only, having n sensation to worry ab push through it. But other(a) times the issues in question may be real definitive and funda workforcetal, and thither would be a social manage. Homointimateity and airy marriages is one such issue, which is still universeness debated widely.With homoeroticism and sp justly marriages be approach path increasingly present in our golf club, it is outstanding that the subject be well debated and tot on the wholey issues projected so that it dishs slew to take appropriate decisions. The issue of quirk is not just relevant for the cooperators, hardly in addition to the families they argon a part of, and to the fellowship as a whole. It is therefore important that the companionship be well informed of the healthy and social pictures of cheery marriages, eon being alive to the fact that evolving lifestyle issues could knock at twainones door. The media has a rattling important and responsible case in part the larger part of the society to come to legal injury with evolving lifestyles. This is perhaps what the moving-picture show The Wedding bed covering has attempted and succeeded. The Wedding Banquet is a profound and touching Chinese film revolving around homoeroticism and family ties. The film brings into mankindage workforcet the perception of modern lifestyles, from the traditional point of view, and the difficulties and experiences involved in coming to terms with it ( feign). The film projects oddity in a wider perspective. A sunny relationship, in the midst of a hetero bring upual person marriage and pargonnting, shows the wider realm of oddity and brisk relationships. The film brings into focus a homophile(a) relationship in the midst of a Taiwanese expatriate Wai-Tung and his doctor boyfriend Simon.When Wai-Tungs pargonnts modify their son for his marriage, he plans to buy time by putting unsufferable conditions for his bride. stock-still a dating company succeeds in finding a suitable match, when Wai-Tung strikes into a convenience marriage with his tenant Wei Wei. The marriage would help Wei Wei from being deported. It is when the parents of Wai-Tung reach America for the wedding bedcover of their son, does they know of the developments in the family. The film has some(prenominal) turning points like when Wei Wei seduces an inebriated Wai-Tung and becomes pregnant, leading to deadening in his relationship with Simon.Wai-Tungs give approves of the actions of Simon, who he takes as his rent son . His en sexuality on t he other hand is drawn affectionally to her daughter-in-law, whom his father determines as a business participant. At the end the father and mother leave for Taiwan, without any discontent. The movie unquestionably seems to address the issue of homo wind upuality in the family context.Bringing the issue of crotchet face-to-face with traditionally heterosexual cultures, gets e realone on their toes to accept the reality. Lifestyle choices are here to stay and traditions must pave way to it and coexist. This low budget film won identification for its director Ang Lee, who himself makes a short appearance as a banquet guest. It similarly won the Golden Bear award in the Berlin withdraw Festival of 1993 and the best film and best director awards at the 1993 Seattle worldwide Film Festival (Berardinelli, 1993). The rights of exactlychs are increasingly gaining pay with time. Homosexuals are being more(prenominal) welcome in our society and their rights are becoming more obv ious. Gone are those days when homosexualism was considered a serious villainy and homosexuals looked upon as people with sick minds. Although there are societies which still consider homosexuality a crime, it isnt as dreadful as it formerly was. These developments indicate the growing perception that homosexuals are a part of our society and therefore should be accorded equal rights, equal protection and equal support from all welfare activities. The favorable trend towards homosexuals may be attributed to the worldwide liberalization of policies in close to parts of the world, broader thinking among people and the flux of cultures and mingling of economics.But it is indeed sad that this never before support, is not extended to animated marriages. A major part of this support and backing, of homosexuality stops short of intrepid marriages. This indifference to gay marriage, particularly from among supporters of homosexuality stems from their perception of marriage and homo sexuality. braws are generally thought to defy quaternary quislings and that therefore their relationships screwnot be deep or emotional. The gays are considered as useable and not being capable of forming indestructible relationships. This description of gays cannot be challenged, as gays do reserve such relationships similarly.However, it should be noted here that such relationships also exist in heterosexual or straight society too, maybe to a small extent and that too mainly among the youth. What nigh people need to on a lower floorstand about gays is that, as gays grow and mature, they too like their straight counterparts begin to value and seek committed lasting relationships. It is important to realize the basics behind the bring outnce of homosexuality. Homosexuality is a naturally developing phenomenon. However, most ignorant people attribute it to a defiance of heterosexual norms and an intention to experiment. Some people feel that gays could take up being a heterosexual if they wanted, but that, only a very few consider that they have a choice. It is only like heterosexuals being asked to choose the sex they are attracted to. It should be understood that being a gay is natural and not selected. Several gay people, two men and women recall being attracted to people of their own sex from a very young age.The sexual penchant in most people emerge at a very earliest age like early adolescence, even prior to any sexual experience. Homosexual orientation is a complex subject and cannot be explained by any single or a simple, plain model. No consistent results have been found from question undertaken for homosexual orientation. Despite studying evolutionary and hormonal pattern in homosexuality, scientists have not yet understood the development of homosexual orientation in an individual. Therefore it is im prim to assume that homosexuals have a choice, which they have chosen to bypass. Today however, most scientists agree that sexual ori entation results from an square up of environment, cognitive and biological factors.Genetic and inborn hormonal traits play an important role in deciding a persons sexual attitude. Psychologists and psychiatrists believe that homosexuality is not due to emotional or rational disorders and it was in 1973, when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its authoritative list of emotional and mental disorders, after appropriate research (APA, 2008). question based on twin studies also indicate that male homosexuality is genetically mediated.A study with about 76 gay brothers and their families in 1993 by Dean Hamer found that gay men had more gay uncles and cousins on the maternal(p) side compared to the paternal side. One of the most tried finding in homosexuality adoption was reported by Blanchard and Klassen in 1997, which suggested that the odds of an individual being a gay increased by 33% correpondingly for each older brother. It has been implied that t he male foetus causes a maternal immune reaction which is increasingly stronger for each successive male foetus. ethereal marriages are wrongly perceived by many an(prenominal) people to warp family environment. The customary saying that marriage is an organisation between a man and a woman holds no water, as there is no real and moral judgement behind it. Such definitions of marriages only spring up questions on the eligibility and authenticity of the defining person or institution.Who should be the one to coiffure marriage?. They feel that same-sex couples cannot bring home the bacon the necessary environment for childrens form growth. In continuation of this, many consider same-sex marriage as a deterrent to births and continuation of species. They dont realise that marriages are not just directed to bearing children, as even infertile couples choose to marry or heterosexual couples sometimes choose against having children. Marriage is more about sharing, spang and commit ment and less about bearing children. It should be realized that gay couples are capable of elevation children as overmuch as any straight couple. The fact that there is no earthshaking difference between the children of gay and straight couples, has been proved by research.Psychologists are of the opinion that the sex activity of the parent is not important in raising the child its the love and commitment on the part of the parents that matter. As for the continuation of species, human species are in no danger of tapered due to reproductive failure. In fact the macrocosm explosion is in reality disturbing and serious issues are at stake for the oncoming generations. frolicsome marriages can only help in slowing the rate of population increase, than adding to it. mirthful marriages have seen results, since it has already been experimented. Denmark legalised gay marriages in 1989.Several Dutch cities have had same-sex marriage rights for many years. The clergy at first offe red opposition to the danish law and a survey conducted at that time indicated that about 72 percent of the clergy opposed the law. However another survey conducted in 1995 revealed that 89 percent of the clergy supported the law. Gay marriages have been experimented and proved to strengthen the institution of marriage and contribute to the society. Any doubts on the success of gay marriages are fully vacated and its positive impact on the society acknowledged. The interpretation of gay marriage in religion should not be ignored when considering gay marriages. Given the binding of religion and its influence on every aspect of life, people consider religious beliefs above all contemporary issues associated with gay marriages, when deciding on them. Some religions are against homosexuality and gay marriages art object some do not consider it as something important to be preached upon. In the Old Testament only two passages are referred to homosexuality, among the some(prenominal) t housands (Piazza, 2007). Buddhism in fact attracts several homosexuals, as there isnt any homophobia preaching in it. The Theravada Buddhism considers all relationships i.e. gay, lesbian or straight as being personal matters bearing mutual consent (Robinson, 2008).Therefore all relationships are considered constructive and acceptable as long as both checkmates are happy. Many people, who believe in Christianity, oppose homosexuality and gay marriage, on the basis of the password. It should primarily be noted here that the watchword was written at a period when there was no sagacity of homosexuality or psychosexual orientation. The bible therefore does not actualise people as lesbians or gays. The inference was only directed to homosexual acts committed by persons who were considered heterosexual. However, the bible has been successfully used to interpret the views of both advocates and opponents of homosexuality whenever homosexuality is deliberated. According to the Roman Catho lic Church, any sex that does not lead to procreation should be avoided and thus the use of condoms and onanism is condemned.However, it should also be noted that the church approves sex among sterile couples and sex during pregnancy, which do not lead to procreation (Corvino, 1997). An important aspect of bible interpretation is that, many Christians interpret all texts with much flexibility buy food when it comes to homosexuality, where all references to homosexual acts are taken literally. The bible actually pays very little attention to this subject and most importantly Jesus speaks postcode on this topic, in the New Testament. This apart, most instructions and recommendations of the bible are of lesser relevance today, like avoiding pork.The teachings are subconsciously breached casually, as we go about our everyday lives. For instance, there was a prominent woman at one time spoke at length against homosexuality, in the course of which she broke several Biblical laws by Le vitical standards (Piazza, 2007), namely speaking in church, she taught men and wore a cotton and polyester dress. The Bible interestingly has a few manikin of same sex love. Davids love for Jonathan was implied to be greater than his love for woman, Ruths deep love relationship with Naomi and Ruths words of pledge are used in most heterosexual weddings. Even though gay couples are now socially sure like never before, they are far from equal civil rights. The deny of civil rights to gay couples can sometimes be life ruining and even life threatening. The inconvenience and sufferings of gay couples as a consequent of these unequal rights can be endlessly give tongue to. In most American states, gay couples are not given the right to make aesculapian decisions for their partners, during emergencies. State laws stipulate that the hospitals should reach out to the families of the hospitalised partner, thereby ignoring the gay partners concern.Very often, the families are not in g ood terms with the gay couple, and may even be without contact for a ample long time. It is obvious that the decisions taken by such families would not be in the best interests of the couple. It is sad that the hostile family even have the right to exclude the partner from the treatment room. Even upon death, the will of the gay partner can be easily challenged and custody decisions overturned by the family (Bidstrup, 2004). Families have the right to deny the surviving partner, even a visit to his partners grave. There are several cases where gay couples had been extremely circumspect in drafting their will, which however were overturned, leaving the surviving partner literally penniless.Whenever arrested, gay couples are forced to permit evidence and testify against their partners. about gay couples, particularly the older ones have numerous such stories of injustices meted out to their friends or acquaintances. The testimony of a gay partner is as distant as the testimony of a complete stranger, in most courts. In case the partner is jailed, the right to visit the partner is denied in most cases.In matters of law, arrest or imprisonment, the whims of a hostile family and the cooperation of a homophobic judge can have devastating effects on the gay couple. The discrimination is pathetically extended even to the children of gay couples, as gay parents are not able to get parenting rights when children are brought into their family, either by birth or through adoption. These are some civil rights issues, which are in no way connected to the nature of marriages. State laws, which provide for the rights of legally married couples, are denied for gay couples. Gay couples are definitely not accorded equal rights, although the situation is improving and would one day incur up with those accorded to heterosexual couples. One must not forget that black marriages were not allowed, till the end of civil war. Until 1967, there were at least(prenominal) 15 states that prohibited interracial marriages. It required a US irresponsible Court decision that year to ensure inter-racial marriages throughout the United States (Robinson). very(prenominal) sex marriages are recent happenings, which were earlier not permitted anywhere in the world.The law is often the deciding factor in the fate of homosexuality like in November 2003 when the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court termed the ban on gay marriage as unconstitutional. Legislators have indeed compete an important role in the acceptance of homosexuality and gay marriages. However there is a lot more for them to do. There are many states in the US, which have yet not legalized gay marriages. Apart from US, there are only a few countries that have recognized homosexual relationships. Social acceptance is a major struggle for homosexuality, which however can begin only after its legalization.Given the progress in acceptableness of homosexuality till now, it is evident that all constitutions should and one day, would legalize homosexuality. It should be noted here that the European Union had demanded Turkey to form more liberal laws on sex, as a condition for its membership. Once homosexuality and gay marriages are legalized, the law should provide for the rights of gay couples, and for individual partners. Gay couples should be allowed to live peacefully like any other family, raise children and plan for their future. Homophobic attitudes should be better identified and punished when it attempts to handicap the rights of gay couples.Gay couples too have the responsibility to stand up against victimization rather than suffer alone in silence, fearing social stigma. It is rightly appropriate here to mention the fact that Brendan Fay had lodged a complaint against the conclusion president for using his marriage images to warn his countrymen against gay marriages. Fays marriage to his partner Tom Moulton, and their marriage certificate was shown in his televised address to the nation. Fay said he considered it to be an insult and has complained to the graduate Consulate in New York (Salazar). The debate on providing equal rights to same-sex couples would go on. The public support for gay couples, would bit by bit translate to more support for marriage rights. However it is the law, which ultimately dictates on the right to gay marriages. The right of the individual to exercise his choice on his personal matters would ultimately be given to him, to enable him to select the gender of his partner. When reciprocal ohm Africas highest court recognised same-sex marriages and decided to extend legal marital rights to gay couples, it became the first country to do so in a continent, which condemns homosexuality.It must be noteworthy to mention here that South Africas constitution is one of worlds most move on and progressive constitutions. Constitutional reforms are important for any society to pull together its trends and demands. Conservative societ ies should recognise and be willing to accept newer trends and passions.Just like racist discrimination was ruled out, a new dawn awaits the everyday removal of discrimination to gay marriage a dawn when all gay couples can live happily with all rights and liberties, without any fear or discrimination. Although we cannot find that a fundamental right to same-sex marriage exists in this state, the unequal dispensation of rights and benefits to committed same-sex partners can no longer be tolerated under our state constitution, said New Jersey Supreme Court evaluator Barry T. Albin, while offering equal rights to same-sex couples. Education too has an important role to play in understanding homosexuality. Understanding the demands and options of todays lifestyle, is very crucial for any individual, and one should have the relevant education to take appropriate decisions. Our traditional educational policies should be revamped with the realities of today. Educators must let people kn ow to what extent the law currently permits one to select the gender of the person he or she wishes to marry. Educators must be prepared to transfigure individuals as responsible persons capable of loving, marrying and raising a family, irrespective of the gender of the partner he or she would be married to.Recognition of same sex relationships as being equal to traditional marriages would drastically delimitate the meaning of family ( horse cavalry, 1997). Educational policy makers should realize that they hold a consecrate duty of imparting education and social skills incorporating relevance to homosexual society too. As the legalization of homosexuality and gay marriages are slowly but steadily gaining ground, one thing is clear these steps will endlessly progress in the same direction. Therefore education must also keep up closely in the same direction for the welfare of its beneficiaries. The legislators have a moral responsibility to provide and ensure proper implementatio n of the marriage rights of gay couples, as civil and partnership laws cannot provide the same benefits as that of marriage (Johnson, 2007). The educators have a responsibility of not only transforming the society to be receptive of gay marriages, but also ensuring that gay couples succeed in every aspect of life. The society as a whole should not only integrate gay couples into its fold, unconditionally, but also be fully prepared to welcome newer lifestyle changes of tomorrow. REFERENCESDon Willmott (2004) The Wedding Banquet Electronic version. Retrieved on March 19, 2008 from http//www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/The-Wedding-BanquetBerardinelli, James (1993) The Wedding Banquet Electronic version. Retrieved on March 19, 2008, from http//www.reelviews.net/movies/w/wedding_ban.htmlSalazar C. New York man files complaint against Polish president for anti-gay marriage speech. International Herald Tribune (19 Mar, 2008) Electronic version fromhttp//www.iht.com/articles/a p/2008/03/19/europe/EU-GEN-Poland-Gay-Rights.phpAmerican Psychological Association. bring upuality Electronic version. Retrieved on March 19, 2008, from http//www.apa.org/topics/orientation.htmlwhatcauses2008Piazza M.S. Homosexuality and Christianity Electronic version. Retrieved onMarch 20, 2008, from http//www.cathedralofhope.comRobinson B.A, (2008). The Buddhist religion and homosexuality Electronic version. Retrieved on March 18, 2008, from http//www.religioustolerance.org/hom_budd.htmCorvino John. wherefore shouldnt Tommy and Jim have sex? A defence of homosexuality. Same Sex Debating the ethics, Science and Culture of Homosexuality, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. (1997).Bidstrup Scott, (2004). Gay Marriage The arguments and the motives Electronic version. Retrieved on March 18, 2008, from http//www.bidstrup.com/marriage.htmKnight Robert,. How domestic partnerships and Gay marriage threaten the family. Insight bulletin, Family Research Council. (1997)Johnson, Ramon. (2007 ) Gay marriage around the world. Electronic version. Retrieved on March 20, 2008, from http//gaylife.about.com/od/samesexmarriage/a/legalgaymarriag.htm