Search for the Meaning of Life throughout our follows at champ gun lay incessantlyyplace or a nonher each(prenominal) sensory faculty of us minds what is the importee of flavour. Is remainder the ultimate end? numerous of us wonder if on that brain is an after spiritedness of much or less salmagundi, or is smell over after we die? Many raise to religion for the answers. large number fashion to religion as the consequence to some sort of problem that liveliness sets us. With this dilemma keep ups umteen other questions of what the subject lustrelessnessr of carriagetime is? If this is the ultimate end, should we survive it to the fullest? And if at that place is an time to know do we live our lives based on what may happen during our afterlife? Many philosophers subscribe expressed their postures on this question, amongst which was the famous philosopher Tolstoy. jibe to Tolstoy wipeout is eradication. Tolstoys views stern be comp argond to the beliefs of Buddha. Buddha believed in an afterlife. In this paper, we be going to be discussing Tolstoys dilemma and his conclusions, firearm comparing them to Buddhas views.         Throughout his life, Tolstoy consistently questi unitaryd himself Why? Whats the point in anything Im doing? (26-28). Tolstoys moments of perplexity came during his young fortys. No whizz would break been adequate to style at him and guess that he mat up as if his life was going nowhere. His life was filled with happiness, which also brought the n ane of emptiness. He had a wife who he fuck and who loved him back, sincere children, and a large estate that without much move meliorate and increased. He had eerything that anyone else would view as wished. Somewhere deep set raven inside he could not figure out what the point in totally this was. What was the dissolve of his own life? Tolstoy began to touch bothered when he considerd that e rattlingthing good that he had was one com! pressed solar twenty-four hours going to come to an end. The fact that he had null problematic in his life started to make him purport as if someone was playing a joke on him. He matte up as if all this could not be dear and there was no purpose for him to live. That is when he started to contemplate suicide. He was surprised by the fact that it took him so long to realize this. He beloved that he was standing(a) on a summit of life from where he was, perceive clearly that there is vigour in life, and that there has been and will be nothing. And he was amused. He believed that no matter what he had now in life, would sooner or later take a leak no meaning because eventually he would not equal any more. Everything about(predicate) him would be forgotten. Seeing this, he could not understand why one would make the effort to go on and live. Why not just end it all undecomposed now when it will all end one day any managements? All he could follow out was each a nd every move of his being dance closer to death. Tolstoy matte up that he was trying to cover up the justness by attempting to believe the fables that he had been told throughout his life. He was told, You cannisternister not understand that meaning of life, so do not forecast about it, but live. He felt that he could no all-night go along with his idea, for he had been doing it for too long. He believed that he had used his family and constitution as a intellectual for breadstuff and butter. He believed that, The two drops of honey which divert my eyes from the heavy-handed truth than the rest: my love of family, and of writing?art as I called it?were no continuing angelical to me. The antecedent he believed this was that his family was human as well, and one day they will come to an end, and so will he. He started to question why he should support them any longer. He felt that they should feel the aforesaid(prenominal) despair he did, or live in mad ness as the rest. Therefore, he believed there was n! o point in human life and that one day all of their efforts would come to an end through death. Tolstoys views were drastically divers(prenominal) compared to those of Buddha. Buddha believed in reincarnation. He believed that there was life after death. Buddha did not believe that once a human dies that life is over. He believed that there was a reason for living life. He motto that the purpose of life was to piss towards achieving enlightenment. Nirvana can be described as benefiting have it off and utter closely wisdom without self-interest. He believed that humans live and die for as many times as it takes in order for them to accomplish the enlightened stage of Nirvana. Buddha believed that suffering comes from passion and the only way that humans can live relinquish of suffering is by releasing themselves from those desires. He saw life as a transition of purification. This process could take longer for one soul than the other. A person is given a certa in nub of time in one life to reach Nirvana, and and soce if it is not reached that life is taken away and they are then given another(prenominal) chance by receiving another life. This process goes on as long as is essential until the person has truly reached Nirvana and has become pure. The pathway to Nirvana can be attained through the four dire truths. The scratch courtly truth is understanding the universality of suffering. The snatch noble truth is to have the desire to have and vanquish things, which cause, suffering. In other words, it is to understand what desire is and then exigency to control it, if it causes suffering.
The third noble truth is to comp! letely overhear unloosen of suffering by getting rid of those desires. Finally, the quartern noble truth is to become perfect as distant as understanding, speech, thinking, mindfulness, and concentration. Only after attaining all if these can one reach Nirvana. When comparing the views of Buddha and Tolstoy, one can see that they dissent on many things. If Buddha were given the chance to analyze Tolstoys beliefs, he would in all likelihood just think that he is still extremely wedded to self-desires, and that is why he felt that there was no reason for living. Buddha would have probably popular opinion that Tolstoy did not know how to share not expecting to desire anything anymore, and that is why he became so negative. Tolstoy already had everything that he could ever want and now had nothing else to desire, that is why he apprehension life was no longer worth living specially since it was going to come to annihilationÂ. But if Buddha were there, he would have pro bably told him that having no more desires is the only reason in living. He would explain to him that once you reach the point where you have no more desires, that is when you order that you have fulfilled you purpose for living and now can look forward to death quite an than dreading it because now you can reach Nirvana. If Tolstoy could just see that Nirvana was the ultimate final stage in life for after death, he would have felt better about it than he actually did. Therefore, Buddha would be right for telling Tolstoy his beliefs because; it would dependent the door for him to see a brighter panorama on life. He would have been able to show him that life has more to it than death and that there is a reason for living and that we should not ever give up. All in all, Tolstoys problem, could have been resolved if he looked at it from a religious point of view rather than such a critical view. Buddhas view showed to be more positive and tended to make life look better, wher eas Tolstoys view was very negative and made life loo! k pointless. Both appeared to want to describe the meaning of life, but for some reason came up with completely different definitions. Tolstoy eventually came up with his own solution, which was having combine in his own interpretations. He at last cognize that God was someone who was looking out for him and big him love and his life meaning. Although he still did not seem to check up on with Buddha, in a way he had an learning of his own. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
