Comparison and contrast on the narrative point of view in metamorphosis and chronicles of a death foretold Essay

In metamorphosis Franz Kafka utilisations a narrative period of time of entrance called third psyche omniscient, where it is close toly especial(a) since only his thoughts and feelings argon presented, tho on the otherwise hand in the chronicles of a decease foretold Garca Mrquez relates the plot of a murder about which everyone knows in the lead it happens through the uptake of a storyteller who tells the story in the start person, as a witness to the events that micturate occurred 27 years earlier, so far the storyteller is recounting the tale years later from an omniscient pinnacle of persuasion, sharing all of the characters thoughts. I intend to comp atomic number 18 and contrast two narrative chief of wads in both metamorphosis and chronicle of a conclusion foretold, through affirming the techniques that are used to clarify this nous of view such as diction, the use of discolor buffoonery, the use of irony etc.One of the properties of first person narrati on is that the teller may be a character who tells the story as he/she considers it. The situation that a first person vote counter tells the story from his/her point of view, in most cases tends to sour the narrator perfidious and therefore unbelievable or in question(predicate) for example in the chronicles of a death foretold the narrator states that capital of Chile Nasar is gratis(p) this shows that the narrator is biased and unreliable. A first-person narrator restrains his own point of view but does not know what other characters are sentiment this is an faculty normally reserved for the third-person omniscient point of view like in metamorphosis. The third-person omniscient point of view can enter the consciousness of either character therefore making him credible and more reliable than a first person narrator.In Kafkas metamorphosis we sometimes see things through Gregors eyes, but more typically we see him omnisciently from the external (from other characters like his father, his mother or his sister) this occurs on page 126 at the beginning of chapter three, this nucleus causes the get worder to feel sympathy for Gregor. This dual effect is extremely powerful in making the indorser believe what they read since it is not only one persons opinion as yet it is many that say the same things. Limited omniscient narrators are usually unbiased or neutral (which means that they dont favour any particular characters).The narrative point of view seems to present a picture of Gregor and the world as he understands it, both before and subsequently his metamorphosis. This does not necessarily mean that all of Gregors judgements are to be accepted in fact it is quite on the contrary, Kafka uses irony and black comedy to indicate that Gregor is at times misled, for instance in thinking he can still go to the office even after becoming an insect and, more sadly, in thinking his family is putting his interests first. Since the narrator is omniscie nt we are inclined the attitudes and tones of other characters in the book, for example when Gregors father first sees Gregor he gets angry thinking that he had lost the only means of providing for his family (page 106) . When we read this we have no doubt that Gregors father Mr. Samsa is angry this is called credibility.The third person omniscient narrator as well helps us in getting a clear picture of the surroundings through description. An example of this can be found at the back of page 105 the description of the stains on the white doors helps to give the reader a mental picture of the surroundings. Another example of this can be found on pages 119-120 when Gregors room is described as intimate and comfortably furnished with old heirlooms. Another example of the third person narrators description of the surroundings is when the narrator describes the view from Gregors window as existence melancholy and quite depressing (through the follow of raindrops and the weather) on page 87. These descriptions all help the reader in catch Gregors pain, suffering and helplessness towards the situation.One of the most outstanding features of recital of a Death Foretold is the point of view Garcia Marquez uses to tell the story. Narrating the story from the first-person point of view is the unnamed son of Luisa Santiago, having returned to the river village after being gone(p) for twenty-seven years, the narrator tries to reconstruct the events of the day that ends in the murder of Santiago Nasar. In this novel, however, Garcia Marquez makes the narrator telling the story credible towards the end to give the effect of confusion.The reader is confused about whether the narrator is reliable or not. Even though the narrator isnt the main character in the text he plays and important roll in the novel as well as in the investigation. The fact that he cannot enter other characters consciousness also complements the fact that first person narrators are unreliable a nd unbelievable. We do not learn what the other characters are thinking or feeling unless they show us by their words or actions. beginning person narration can be unreliable due to the limited knowledge and/or understanding of events that have occurred. The author may use this unreliability to give questionable moral values or to make the character or reader biased about the people and events that are described.The difference between objectivity and subjectivity is the difference between fact and opinion, An design piece of information, therefore, needs to be the whole truth or at least to be unbiased, whereas a subjective point of view is biased because it is either not the complete picture or it is further a perspective or an expression of feelings. Depending on whether the narrator is objective or subjective we can judge whether the narrator is reliable or not. If the narrator in chronicles of a death foretold was omniscient he could have given a reliable account of the events that took place after the murder, however since he is biased, he blurs the edges and makes the diseases that the people of the town obtained seem as if they were being punished for not stopping the Vicario brothers.However, scientifically the diseases had nothing to do with guilt. The narrator in chronicles of a death foretold also creates confusion through with child(p) enlarge that arent connected to the murder as well as diverse versions of the chronological events. For example in the beginning of the text the narrator gives accounts of the weather on the day of the murder and showed that each character gave different versions of the weather according to how each of the characters were associated with Santiago Nasar (page 17), the narrator also gives details that arent linked to the murder such as the details given about the wedding (lavish, expensive etc.).The techniques used to clarify the narrative point of view include the use of irony, black comedy, magic realism, dictio n and fourth dimension structure. For example in metamorphosis when Gregor attempts to get out of bed, Kafka uses black comedy to give the effect that any topics or events that are regarded as beneficial or depressing are treated with humor. Another technique of explain narrative point of view used by Mrquez is the use of quotations persistently throughout the text. The word liberating on page 107 in metamorphosis, as well as the line Gregor waited in vain reflect Gregors inner thoughts as the omniscient narrator reveals them, this suggests that the narrator is objective and that the narrator is omniscient.In metamorphosis the point of view invokes as the corpse of Gregor Samsa is discovered, this shift in the point of view convinces the reader that the Samsas had been relieved from an wide burden. The removal of the burden off the Samsa family helps them in planning for the future as if Gregor never existed. This gives the reader the impression that the Samsas are cruel and l oathsome and it also creates a feeling of pity for Gregor.In conclusion I strongly believe that point of view is very important in Chronicles of a death foretold as well as in metamorphosis. I believe that both writers were successful in their choices of narrative point of view. If I was to describe the narrative point of view in chronicles of a death foretold in one word then it is fatalistic, however if I was to describe the narrative point of view in metamorphosis in one word it would be accommodative.