- -
If intelligence sets us apart among organisms, then I hold is probable that natural selection acted to
maximize the flexibility of our behaviour. What would be much adaptive for a learning and thinking animal: genes
selected for aggression, shock an d xenophobia; or selection for learning rules that can picture aggression in
appropriate circumstances and peacefulness in others. - Stephen Jay Gould, 1981
True enough, the plasticity of humane behavior is a very important hallmark
of the species; one which has facilitated its stagger into almost all(prenominal)
ecosystem on the planet. Yet, as correct as Goulds conclude is; he is
overlooking some important perspecti ves.
For one; assuming that cosmos evolved from organisms which had
substantially less ability to learn ontogenicaly; it is hard to deny that there
must be, at least some residual effects of prior exploitation present in modern
human behavior. It seems highly un likely that the behavior of humanity,
however malleable, has alone escaped the slow progressive influence of
genetic selection.
If human behavior is learned, and is fully controlled by the freewill of the
individual, then why is it so hygienic ge bed to adaptive, gene promoting action?
Is it by random break that humans the world over choose to feel painfully
jealous if their correspond leaves them for another or anguished at the loss of a
child? Did every culture in the world independently just surpass to feel
aversion to incest and create taboos against it?
Humans dont learn to get hungry when their bodies need nourishment; they
get an urge that influences their behavior in an unarguably adaptive manner.
People are averted by spoiled food because it smells bad. Rotten food smells
bad because it sickened an d killed all those who did not mind its odor. There
is nothing in the...
If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment