Analysis of Major Characters
Oliver Twist
As the child hero of a melodramatic bracing of social protest, Oliver Twist is meant to appeal more to our sentiments than to our literary sensibilities. On many levels, Oliver is not a believable character, because although he is elevated in corrupt surroundings, his purity and virtue ar absolute. throughout the novel, Dickens uses Olivers character to challenge the Victorian idea that paupers and criminals are already evil at birth, arguing instead that a corrupt environment is the source of vice. At the same time, Olivers incorruptibility undermines whatever of Dickenss assertions. Oliver is shocked and horrified when he sees the Artful Dodger and Charley Bates selection a strangers pocket and again when he is forced to embark in a burglary. Olivers moral scruples about the sanctity of property seem inborn in him, just as Dickenss opponents thought that corruption is inborn in poor people. Furthermore, former(a) pauper children use rough Cockney slang, but Oliver, oddly enough, speaks in proper Kings English. His grammatical fastidiousness is also inexplicable, as Oliver presumably is not well-educated. Even when he is abused and manipulated, Oliver does not become dotty or indignant. When Sikes and Crackit force him to assist in a robbery, Oliver except begs to be allowed to run away and die in the fields.
Oliver does not present a confused picture of a person torn between good and evil--instead, he is goodness incarnate.
Even if we power feel that Dickenss social criticism would have been more potent if he had focused on a more complex poor character, like the Artful Dodger or Nancy, the auditory sense for whom Dickens was writing might not have been pervious to such a portrayal. Dickenss Victorian middle-class readers were likely to staunch opinions on the poor that were only a...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment