Flood narratives atomic number 18 present in both the Sumerian large of Gilgamesh and in the Bible and although they are very similar, they are in any case very different. The Sumerian version of the overeat story is related to a polytheistic, antropocentric and fatalistic worldview, while the Hebrew myth is base on a mo nonheistic, theocentric and ethically casual worldview.
The big differences are evident already from the start of the stories. While in the Bible, immortal makes his restore decision about bringing down the flood, gods in Gilgamesh must hold a council to decide:
the gods in heaven decided in their council... (Gilgamesh p. 63)
And the Lord said, I entrust write down man whom I have created... (the Bible p. 11 §7)
This is the first gear version of the contrast between polytheistic and monotheistic worldviews. matinee idol in the Bible cannot hold a council as he does not have any peerless to consult with. In Gilgamesh gods cannot make sole decisions as they have limited powers and one god could not bring such a disaster on the men.
Another indication of limited powers of the Sumerian gods is the size of the flood.
In Gilgamesh only one city is flooded while in the Bible every(prenominal) living thing is wiped out all over the existence:
the gods in heaven decided in threi council
to bring the flood down on the fortunate city. (Gilgamesh p. 66)
And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the eart; (the Bible, p. 11 §7).
Another evidence of the difference between monotheism in the Bible and polytheism in Gilgamesh is the difference betwen the tokens both survivours get in the end. While Utnapishtim gets a talisman all for himself and also become immortal - is sure into the company of the gods, in...
If you want to get a full essay, nine it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment