Human beings throughout time have struggled with the idea of umpire. Justice whitethorn mean reward for a good deed or punishwork forcet for a bad one. Argument about umpire generally centers on the latter. Should we pursue rightness even when it is costly, degenerate and painful? May innocents be sacrificed in the pursuit of justice? Does guilt, demanding justice, permeate whole groups (i.e. family, class, race) or just individuals? The pursuit of justice often leads to new wrong and further revenge in a vicious cycle. Is justice worth seeking? In Agamemnon and Medea, Aeschylus and Euripides give their answers to this question. Aeschylus seeks for redemption and true justice in Agamemnon; Euripides chooses to deliver the ideal of justice in Medea.
Man, in Aeschylus work, is a travel creature. His purpose is to enter into a community of other men and there to have joy. Because his characters argon striving toward this goal they are likeable. We sympathize with their motives even if we do not sympathize with their actions. Agamemnon and Clytemnestra some(prenominal) are portrayed as reasonable people who in truth wish for justice but feel they have been coerce to murder in its pursuit. They are presented with a terrible dilemma.
each they must ignore injustice or they must, in an campaign to rectify injustice, commit a new crime which forget call for revenge. Agamemnon thinks that if only one more injustice tail end be borne the sacrifice of Iphigenia then Troy can be punished and the world can begin again with a clean slate. Clytemnestra believes the same. She is ready to make contract/ With the Evil sense of the House of Atreus/ To accept what has been till now, hard though it is./ simply that for the future he shall leave this house/ And wear away(predicate) some...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment